Thursday, July 20, 2017

Batman '66 Meets the Legion of Super-Heroes #1 Review

What Happened That You Have to Know About:

The Legion of Super-Heroes team up with Batman and Robin to fight Universo and Egghead in the 1960s and the 2060s.


I know that this has been out for a while on Comixology. I'm not on Comixology; I read this for the first time yesterday.

It was okay. Cheap-and-cheerful done-in-one superhero story. It worked 75 years ago and it works now. The Allreds are obviously proficient with the material, and gamely try to grapple with futuristic teen slang. I can see myself reading this again.

One little problem I had with the story... why exactly was Projectra disguising herself as Phantom Girl? Did they explain that and I missed it?

Can't help but notice that DC's choice of crossovers for the LSH have included, in recent years, the 1960s Star Trek lineup, the Atomic Knights (a 1960s comic), the Batman and Robin from the 1960s TV show, and Bugs Bunny, whose adventures ran originally from the 1940s through the 1960s. I don't like it. The Legion was not made for nostalgia.

Any LSH news from San Diego?

Art: 125 panels/20 pages = 6.25 panels/page. No splash pages! (Note that the Bugs Bunny/LSH comic had ten more pages than this, and fewer panels!)

The Allreds handle all the creative stuff in this comic, and I have to say I'm not a big fan of the art style. It's, uh... I dunno. Simple? Flat? It's clear and effective and I thoroughly admire how much they pack into a page, but the way it looks just doesn't appeal to me. The specific features that stand out to me as me particularly not liking them are Batman's lips and the lines in his cheeks.

Note that there are a lot of little circular panels, presumably a thematic echo of the two villains of the story; that's cool.

Roster Notes: The lineup featured here is a very mid-sixties one. 1966, probably! (I'm not going to check that to see if it's right or not.) Shadow Lass is cited as the newest member, and as we all know, Shady and Ferro Lad were never teammates in the Silver Age LSH stories. The comic book addresses this, though, describing Ferro Lad's death in the Sun-Eater as a "time-branch" created by the Time Trapper that the Legion has already dealt with. I bring this up not because there's any real reason to scrutinize the continuity of a one-off novelty comic like this one, but because I'm wondering if DC might adopt this approach to continuity in regular Legion comics. It could be very useful.

Labels: ,

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Legion of Super-Heroes/Bugs Bunny Review

What Happened That You Have to Know About:

Nothing in the strictest sense; this story is way out of continuity. Basically, Supergirl is sick and the Legion of Super-Heroes tries to bring in Superboy to help, but they get Bugs Bunny instead, and there are various shenanigans with Computo 2 and Validus.


To me the biggest question about this comic book is, do they get Bugs Bunny right? Because to get Bugs Bunny right is difficult. It hasn't been done often. In the old Warner Brothers cartoons they do, but there's a point in the '60s or '70s where they obviously lose the trick of it and he just isn't funny anymore. The thing that makes Bugs funny is... I don't know if I'm going to be able to say this right... the unhurried deliberateness of his snarkiness. This is a hard thing to get across in comics.

Anyway, the writer, Sam Humphries, does not too bad of a job in this sense. Like, it's not really funny, but it's kinda funny in the right way. There are also jokes that come at the Legion's expense, and those mostly don't land. They're decent enough jokes; they just don't have a lot to do with the Legion. In particular, consider the Timber Wolf jokes. Funny stuff, but this Timber Wolf doesn't resemble any Timber Wolf we've ever seen in comics or on TV. I'm not complaining; I'm just describing.

I've seen people talking up Humphries as a potential Legion writer on the basis of this comic, and I don't know if I see what they see. Not that he did anything wrong; it's a decent comic book. It's more that I don't know what this funny one-shot comic has to do with an ongoing Legion title. They seem to require two different skill sets. Sure, he seems to have an easy familiarity with the material, but that's the smallest part of it. Maybe he would be good! But we shouldn't take this as an audition.

Thing about this comic book; it has an eight-page backup feature which is kind of a juvenile Gold-Key-style retelling of the main story. I don't know why we want this; it doesn't seem to be much value-added. Do all the DC/Looney Tunes crossovers have this?

tl;dr: if you need to scratch your Legion itch, you could do worse than to pick up this comic book. It's pretty good. It's on a different mission from most Legion comics, but it does complete it.

- of course scholars of old cartoons will recognize "illudium phosdex" as the shaving cream molecule from the original Duck Dodgers short
- Bugs dresses up like Wonder Wabbit of the Just'a Lotta Animals at one point
- note that there's a resemblance between this story, with Computo 2, and the '70s story where Brainiac 5 builds a Supergirl robot
- I had to squint at the page for a while to make sure I had the layout of Bugs's house straight
- Where did this Lightning Lass costume originate? Was it from Convergence? I know it's fairly new


The art is provided by Tom Grummett and Scott Hanna, and it's very attractive. Everybody looks like what they should look like; the 31st century and 21st century are both well-rendered. Maybe a little light on the backgrounds, and too many splash pages. But it was a lot nicer work than you might expect to find in a novelty crossover comic like this.

Panel count: 122 panels/30 pages = 4.0 panels/pg; 4 splash pages.

Membership Notes:

We're borrowing from all across original-Legion history here. Notice we've got Shadow Lass's 1960s look, and we've also got Invisible Kid II. So there's no point in paying too much attention to this. But I do have one question. Where's Lightning Lad? He's not there. He also wasn't there in the Convergence series. I wonder if DC is trying to de-emphasize him for some reason, like if they want to use Lightning Lass instead.

Labels: ,

Monday, April 17, 2017

Broken Ladder

There's a pattern I noticed recently that I've never seen any comment on. This pattern is for Legion of Super-Heroes comics (and related materials) to increase in quality as time goes on.

Let's break it down by decade. Obviously the '50s were better than the '40s, since the Legion didn't exist at all in the '40s. Just as obviously, the '60s were better than the '50s, since there were only two short Legion stories in the '50s. Meanwhile, the '60s had the famous Adventure Comics run, in which most of the key concepts and characters of the Legion franchise were created. Jim Shooter took over as the primary writer in 1966 and helped modernize DC Comics's storytelling as he did so.

But the 1970s was even better! There was a little publishing hiccup at the start, sure, but young up-and-coming creators like Shooter, Cary Bates, Paul Levitz, Dave Cockrum, Mike Grell, and Jim Sherman brought more sophisticated stories to the Legion than we had ever seen before. Plus, Karate Kid got his own title for a while there; the Legion's first spinoff. And the Legion got to share the title of the comic book with Superboy; they hadn't had that in the '60s.

But the 1980s was even better! The Legion got the title all to themselves, and Paul Levitz returned as writer. Paul Levitz's second run as Legion writer is one of the most highly-regarded in comics' history, and justly so. The '80s brought us the Great Darkness Saga, the deluxe Baxter format, and more spinoffs: Cosmic Boy, Secrets of the Legion of Super-Heroes, Legionnaires 3, and Who's Who in the Legion of Super-Heroes.

But the 1990s was even better! The Five Years Later era had the most powerful stories the Legion has ever seen, before or since. That was brought to an end by a reboot, unfortunately, but the new reboot Legion neatly sidestepped some of the common dysfunctions of the era and gave us years of bright, fun comics that updated many of the characters and stories of the Silver Age. Plus: Valor! L.E.G.I.O.N.! Timber Wolf! Legends of the Legion! Legion: Science Police! Superboy's Legion! Not only that, but the Legion made their first TV appearance on an episode of Superman: The Animated Series.

But the 2000s was even better! Dan Abnett and Andy Lanning took over and gave us five years of some of the best Legion comics ever created, perhaps as good as the Five Years Later era. When a reboot shut that down, Mark Waid picked up the baton for thirty issues of the best-conceived version of the Legion we had seen; finally, the team made sense in a way they never really had before. Meanwhile, the Legion got their own cartoon for two seasons, and the cartoon had its own spinoff comic; both were good with occasional gusts to great. Meanwhile meanwhile, DC introduced yet another version of the Legion, the retroboot Legion, to appeal to those fans who missed the original Legion and had never warmed to the reboot or threeboot. This had its problems but was very well-received, and it culminated in the magnificent crowdpleaser Final Crisis: Legion of 3 Worlds limited series. In addition to all of this, the '00s also brought us Titans/Legion: Universe Ablaze, appearances on Smallville and Justice League Unlimited, and any number of Legion-related toys. We blogged! We podcasted!

But the 2010s was... pretty poor, actually. DC didn't seem to know what to do with the Legion after FC:L3W, and futzed around with it in this title and that one before bringing back Paul Levitz for another kick at the can. Levitz was unable to summon the old magic, and after a while the comic book was cancelled, and it remains cancelled years later. We've had insufficiently-interesting limited series like Legion: Secret Origin and a crossover with Star Trek, and DC occasionally gives the LSH a guest appearance here or there, or hints that they're going to have a big appearance in this title or that TV show but then doesn't follow through on it. Even worse, there was Legion Lost v2.

I write this in the spring of 2017. It's not too late for DC to make the 2010s a better decade for Legion fans than the 2000s were... but they'd better hurry, and they'd better come up with something pretty damn awesome, if that's their intention. Unfortunately, I don't think that's their intention, and I don't think they could accomplish it if it was. But, hey: crossover issues with Bugs Bunny and Batman '66! That's what we've wanted all along, right?

Labels: ,

Thursday, March 02, 2017

Toward a Superhero Style Guide

I've been kicking this blogpost around for years in my head. It's something I've always found interesting, but, well, I may be the only one. I'd start to write it up, and never quite finish it, because I'd think, well, there really isn't enough here... But no longer! Let's just do it!

Some years ago I did some work as an editor. When you're copyediting a book or something, one of the things you have is a style guide. This is a collection of rules that tell you how to handle all of the aspects of your language which are basically optional. Do you use the Oxford comma or not? Toward or towards? That kind of thing. It's also where you list all the difficult words in your particular book, or whatever, so you have someplace to look up just how all that stuff is spelled and capitalized.

The field of superheroes is one which contains many nuances that are best addressed through a style guide. We can't do a complete guide; that'd be a tremendous project. But we can start. Here are some points:

First, the word "superhero". There's a pattern with English compound words: they enter the language as two separate words that are strongly associated. Then they become a hyphenated word. Then finally they become a single word. We had this pattern with "super hero" -> "super-hero" -> "superhero". (Another example: "base ball" -> "base-ball" -> "baseball"... but "comic book" hasn't turned into "comic-book" yet. Not the noun, anyway.) The word should certainly be rendered as "superhero" now, but notice that one superhero group, formed during a previous stage of the word's development, is canonically "the Legion of Super-Heroes". So there's the first item for our style guide.

1. superhero. Exception: Legion of Super-Heroes. As in, Wildfire is a superhero, and he is also a member of the Legion of Super-Heroes

Next, superhero names. Your standard generic superhero name will have some kind of descriptive word added to a word indicating the superhero's sex and age. There are four basic ways of doing this, and we have famous examples for all four:

Wonder Woman

None of the four ways are superior to each other; it's just that, for a given character, one is correct and the other ones aren't, and you have to know which. There's no trick to it. You just have to know.

2a. Superman, Batman, Aquaman, Supergirl
2b. Wonder Woman, Iron Man, Power Girl
2c. Spider-Man. Note the capital "M" in "Man". "Spider-man" is incorrect, and in fact I don't know of any superheroes using that format of name
2d. WordGirl. This is a fairly rare one; the only other superhero I know with a name anything like this is CoreFire from the novel Soon I Will Be Invincible, by Austin Grossman

Note how the Legionnaires fit into this. Superboy and Supergirl are type A, but most of the rest of them are type B. Anytime someone (especially the letterer of a DC comic!) renders a Legionnaire's name as, say, "Sunboy" or "Dreamgirl" rather than the correct "Sun Boy" or "Dream Girl", it makes me wince. The exceptions? "Visi-Lad" and "Earth-Man", both type C. (And, also, the animated LSH featured "Superman-X" in their second season.) (And while we're on the subject, note the capital "E" in "Matter-Eater Lad".)

Some other instructive examples of how this works:
- Sussa Paka is "Spider Girl", but May Parker is "Spider-Girl".
- Rita Farr Dayton is "Elasti-Girl", but Helen Parr is "Elastigirl".
- Bette Kane is "Bat-Girl", but Barbara Gordon is "Batgirl".
- Charles McNider and Pieter Cross are "Dr. Mid-Nite", but Beth Chapel is "Doctor Midnight".

(I used to think that Hollis Mason was "Nite Owl" while Dan Dreiberg was "Nightowl", but it turned out I was incorrect about that and I can't even figure out where I got it from. They're both "Nite Owl".)

Let's look at some more capitalization. This is a can of worms, because the comic-book industry has been conspiring to cover up all the problems for decades. Because they use all caps! All caps suits the needs of the actual comic books well enough, but I, sitting here typing, am forced into tough decisions. 

Obviously planets should be capitalized, like "Krypton". But what about its radioactive rubble? Should it be "Kryptonite" or "kryptonite"? In general, in this article, I'm taking my cue from Wikipedia. This is not because I consider them to be particularly authoritative, but because, if I have no real opinion about how it should be, I figure their way is as good as any. Anyway, they like 

3. "kryptonite"

and I don't disagree.

But look. The Martian Manhunter's real name is rendered by Wikipedia as "J'onn J'onzz". This is fine: the two parts of his name are treated as one word each, and there's no need to capitalize the first letter after the apostrophes. Miss Martian's real name, "M'gann M'orzz", is similar. That's good; that's a rule. But "Mon-El" (see that? Similarly "Kal-El", "Kara Zor-El": both parts capitalized) had a Martian variant of his name in the reboot, and Wikipedia renders it "M'Onel". Surely it should be 

4. "M'onel"

Luornu Durgo's home planet was spelled, in the Five Years Later era, "Carggg". This was kind of cool, because the three "G"s reflect the triplicating ability of the planet's inhabitants. But it didn't catch on, so the spelling is properly

5. "Cargg"

Duplicate Boy's real name has been rendered in a few different ways over the years. The DC creators have tried to handwave this away by saying that Lallorian grammar permits the rearrangement of the various syllables. Yeah, nice try. We've seen "Qued Orlu" and "Quelu Ord" but let's keep things simple and stick with

6. "Ord Quelu"

Oh, and one more thing:

7. Stupidly, either "Bgtzl" or "Bgztl" are correct for Phantom Girl's homeworld. DC has just given up on getting it right, partly because nobody really knows what "right" is

Labels: ,

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Generic blogpost

It's been a while since I've posted. How are you?

I've been keeping an eye on Legion-related developments, but, uh, I'm not really intrigued yet. Like, here's what we know so far about the post-Rebirth Legion:
- Saturn Girl exists
- Brainiac 5 exists and seems young
- the Emerald Empress exists

I haven't actually acquired any of the comics that have their little cameo appearances so far. Just seen the panels online. That's all I need, right? I'll probably get this Batgirl, Supergirl stuff that's coming up. But... is this really going to be yet another soft Legion reset that pretends that there have been no Legion stories thought up since the mid-'80s? Come on. Just because we've got no future doesn't mean that the DC Universe has to have no future. But this is what you get with Geoff Johns. Feh.

Also some hints of a Legion storyline on the Supergirl TV show. This also does not excite me, and I will explain why. First, they can do whatever they want on their show of course, but this Mon-El isn't a lot like any Mon-El I've ever read about. I don't dislike him, but I'm also not pretending that they're giving me what I want. Second, the Legion is too big of a subject to do properly as a one-shot on somebody else's show. What's the point of Supergirl doing the same thing that Superman: The Animated Series, Justice League Unlimited, and Smallville did? Hey, look, it's the Legion of Super-Heroes! Wave at them, quick, before they're gone! There was nothing wrong with those episodes, but as a Legion of Super-Heroes fan, what I want is some Legion of Super-Heroes stories. I like Supergirl stories and Justice League stories and Superman stories, and I don't mind one more of them that happens to feature the Legion, but I already have plenty of Supergirl stories and Justice League stories and Superman stories around. What I'm running short on is new Legion stories.

And those can only be properly delivered, on TV, in their own series. And it has to be an animated series. This is for two reasons. First, budget. You can animate the 31st century and its superpowered denizens a lot more easily than you can render it in live action. If you try it in live action, it'll look cheesy. Second, cast. The Legion has a large cast with a lot of important characters, and not all of those characters can get a satisfactory amount of screen time in every episode. This is a problem in live action, because your main cast contracts for a certain number of episodes, and so on. Voice actors, easier to move in and out, or even double up on. Not that anything like this looks like it's on the horizon.

The Major Spoilers people have started a Legion podcast, called "The Legion Clubhouse", that's pretty good so far. The RSS feed is probably "", if you want to give it a spin.

To sum up. Nostalgia still bad. Legion on Supergirl, who cares. Legion in their own comic-book series or animated TV series, good. Legion Clubhouse podcast, pretty good. LLL.